Legal Opinion

Pitts v. Port East Pulaski Highway

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1990No. 710PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

Did the trial court err in denying the appellant’s petition to amend its pleading to designate the defendant as Port East Transfer Co., Inc. instead of Port East Pulaski Highway?

Plaintiff, Abe Pitts, filed suit against Port East Pulaski Highway on January 20, 1984 and claimed damages for personal injuries which he sustained in an accident on July 19, 1983. Plaintiff took a default judgment against the *67designated defendant and refused a request to open the judgment against Port East Pulaski Highway. Port East Transfer Co., Inc. then moved to open the default judgment. After…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Gabriel v. O'HARASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Junk v. East End Fire DepartmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Barr v. General Accident Group Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zercher v. Coca-Cola USASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Arnold v. Davis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Pike County1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API