In re Peoples
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Disciplinary Commission has charged the Respondent, Nora E. Peoples, with numerous violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. The con*670duct giving rise to the allegations centers on the Respondent's use of rented automobiles. The Commission's verified complaint for disciplinary action is in four counts.
This Court appointed a hearing officer, pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11, who, following full hearing, tendered to this Court his findings of fact and conclusions of law. The hearing officer made no recommendation as to…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of HuebnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Matter of LaCavaIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of GrotrianIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- In Matter of TranskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of: Arthur J. Usher, IVIndiana Supreme Court · 2013