In Matter of Transki
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Respondent was charged in a Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action with violating Rule 8.4(b) and Rule 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Responsibility for Attorneys at Low. The charges stem from Respondent's guilty plea to a felony charge of filing a false federal tax return. Daniel J. Molter was appointed hearing officer pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 28(11)(b), and, after hearing, tendered to this Court his findings of fact and recommendations. Neither Respondent nor the Commission has challenged the tendered report. As in all such cases, this…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of GemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of OrtizIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
4Cited by6 opinions
- Stansberry v. HowardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Matter of ColmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- In re O'ConnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- In re PeoplesIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re GariepyIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.