Legal Opinion

In the Matter of: Arthur J. Usher, IV

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2013No. 49S00-1105-DI-298PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Discipline Action

2Per curiam

We find that Respondent, Arthur J. Usher, IV, committed attorney misconduct by, among other things, engaging in a pervasive pattern of conduct involving dishonesty and misrepresentation that was prejudicial to the administration of justice. For this misconduct, we conclude that Respondent should be suspended from the practice of law in this state for at least three years without automatic reinstatement.

This matter is before the Court on the report of the hearing officer appointed by this Court to hear evidence on the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission’s…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Matter of FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In re DempseyIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Binder v. Benchwarmers Sports LoungeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of: R. Mark KeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In the Matter of Robert James HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 2026
  3. In the Matter of Robert James HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 2026
  4. In the Matter of Robert James HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 2026
  5. In the Matter of: Joseph M. Johnson IIIIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API