Matter of Walker
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Respondent, Max K. Walker Jr., was charged in a disciplinary complaint with violations of Rules 8.4(a), 8.4(b), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. The hearing officer appointed in this case tendered his findings of fact which were not challenged by the parties. He declined to reach a conclusion as to whether Respondent's conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, which is the issue argued by the parties and now before us for determination.
The unchallenged findings establish that Respondent represented the grievant in…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of RocheIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
4Cited by14 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. PainterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Matter of MagidSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Jamie F. DeremiahSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Matter of PrincipatoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- In re GrellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.