Legal Opinion

Carpy v. Dowdell

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1901No. S.F. No. 1670PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court and in the decision rendered in the same case upon the former appeal. {Carpy v. Dowdell, 115 Cal. 677.)

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This case has been before the court in the past. (Carpy v. Dowdell, 115 Cal. 677.) The facts involved in the litigation are set out in detail in the decision rendered at that time, and we will now only state those which are necessary to a consideration of the questions presented upon this appeal. Defendants are appealing from a judgment of foreclosure rendered against them upon two certain notes and chattel mortgages. Plaintiff, as assignee of the notes and mortgages from the Bank of St. Helena, brings this action of foreclosure.

It is first contended that the findings are substantially the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alexander v. AngelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Engineering Service Corp. v. Longridge Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Engineering Etc. Corp. v. Longridge Inv. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. In Re Estate of HewittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. McAllister v. McDonaldMontana Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API