Legal Opinion

Dougan v. Aurora Electric Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2002No. S-9937, S-9958PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Randy S. Dougan sustained work-related injuries during his employment with Aurora Electric. The Alaska Workers' Compensation Board heard and resolved his claims. Dougan appealed the board's decision to the superior court. Dougan now appeals the superior court's decisions that he was not entitled to penalties and interest on his award and that thirteen of his fifteen claims should be dismissed. Aurora cross-appeals the decision by the superior court that the board wrongly denied Dougan a compensation rate adjustment.

We affirm the denial of penalties and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Millette v. MilletteAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Willoya v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Louie v. BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API