Legal Opinion

Smith v. CSK Auto, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2009No. S-12690PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

An employee who injured his back at work signed a partial compromise and release (C & R) of his workers' compensation claim, waiving reemployment benefits and permanent total disability benefits in exchange for $10,000. The Alaska Workers' Compensation Board approved the partial C & R. About two years later, the employee petitioned to vacate the partial C & R on a number of grounds. The Board and the Alaska Workers' Compensation Appeals Commission rejected his arguments. Because we determine that the Board failed to follow its own regulations when it…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ramsey v. City of Sand PointAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Witt v. WatkinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Vandenberg v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Windel v. Mat-Su Title Insurance Agency, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API