Legal Opinion

Smith v. National Cashflow Systems, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 6, 1992No. 91-313PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

In this case, we are requested to determine whether a licensed collection agency can obtain assignments of debts and then bring an action on the debts in its own name, as “the real party in interest,” pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 17(a).

The appellee, National CashFlow Systems, Inc. (CashFlow) is a duly licensed collection agency in the state of Arkansas. Under a written assignment form, which recited a payment of $10, CashFlow purchased assignments of two separate debts, totalling $196.84 and which were owed by appellant, Zenas Lyn Smith, to the Millard-Henry…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arkansas Bar Association v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. Gladden v. BucySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Pope County Bar Ass'n, Inc. v. SuggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Childs v. PhilpotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Davis v. University of Arkansas Medical Center & Collection Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Abstract and Title Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Forrest Construction, Inc. v. MilamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Forrest Construction, Inc. v. MilamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Watkins v. HadamekCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  5. American Abstract and Title Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API