Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Hadamek

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 21, 1994No. CA 93-1286PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin Mayfield, Judge.

Leonard and Shirley Watkins appeal from an order quashing writs of garnishment.

On February 23, 1993, appellants obtained a judgment against appellees Donna Hadamek and Tina Adams in the amount of $20,289.00. The judgment was unpaid and on June 4, 1993, appellants served the third in a series of writs of garnishment on Tyson Foods, Inc., garnishee, alleging that Tyson was “indebted to the Defendant or have in your possession goods, chattels, moneys, credits, or effects belonging to the Defendant.” A copy of the writ of garnishment was served on the appellees.

On July 21,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. G.A.C. Trans-World Acceptance Corp. v. Jaynes Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Smith v. National Cashflow Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Northwest Nat'l Bank v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. FarnamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API