Legal Opinion

Gladden v. Bucy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 17, 1989No. 89-11PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

At the beginning of the second trial of this suit, the court sua sponte declared that the appellant was not the proper party to bring the action and therefore dismissed the complaint. For his appeal, the executor of the estate argues that the court erroneously refused to allow the guardian of the estate or the decedent’s three minor children to be added as plaintiffs. We hold that the court erred in dismissing the suit for lack of standing.

The executor of the decedent’s estate filed an action against an insurance agent and an insurance company, alleging that the agent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Hess v. WimsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. House v. LongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Monaghan v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Childs v. PhilpotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Pulaski Ass'n of Classroom TeachersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Dougan v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. McDonald's Corp. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Taylor v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API