Turner v. Prigmore
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first and second grounds of objection to the allowance •of the intervention may be disposed of together. The first objection, that the contract with the real estate agent Richey is not one which the guardian could legally enter into, is obviously without merit. By the Code, § 49-213, it is provided that “Guardians may make contracts for labor or service, for the benefit of the estates of their wards, upon such terms as they may deem best.” Certainly finding a purchaser for property is rendering service to one for whom it is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kniepkamp v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Richards v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- McCord v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Ethridge v. PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Mitchell County v. HudspethSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dooley v. ScogginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- FIRST NATIONAL BANK &C. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Humber v. GarrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Rockefeller v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Keown v. CraigSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971