Humber v. Garrard
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
The proceedings in the present case were instituted by a guardian of an incompetent ward, seeking an order for reinvestment of the property of his ward, under the Code, §§ 49-203, 49-204. The bill of exceptions recites that the case is brought-to the Supreme Court, “which has exclusive jurisdiction in all cases of an equitable character, the same being a proceeding before the judge in chambers, and involving solely the question of sale > by a guardian for purposes of reinvestment.” In 'order to determine the court having jurisdiction of this case, it is necessary to decide…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Richards v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Webb v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Cooney v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- McGowan v. LufburrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Sharp v. FindleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grading, Inc. v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Heath v. StinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Heath v. StinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Humber v. GarrardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949