FIRST NATIONAL BANK &C. v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) While this court has .held in a number of cases that the protective powers of a court of chancery over trust estates and the estates of.-wards of chancery are “broad, comprehensive, and plenary”. (Orr v. Orr, 197 Ga. 866, 30 S. E. 2d, 900; Turner v. Prigmore, 202 Ga. 377, 43 S. E. 2d, 259; Dooley v. Scoggins, 208 Ga. 200, 66 S. E. 2d, 62, and cases there cited), it will be noted that in all such cases the power is exercised to protect and not destroy trust estates and estates of wards in chancery. There are other equally well settled…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Olmstead v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Bramblett v. Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Stringfellow v. HarmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Palmer Brick Co. v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ewing v. First Nat. Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Folsom v. RowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Rockefeller v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Collins v. Citizens & Southern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- Warner v. Trust Company BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.