Legal Opinion

Dooley v. Scoggins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1951No. 17503PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

1. “Where a writ of error is sued out by one party who is entitled to except, an amendment may be made in the Supreme Court adding as plaintiffs in error the names of all other persons' who were coparties with the plaintiff in error in the court below and who may appear from the record to be proper or necessary parties plaintiff in error.” Ramey v. O’Byrne, 121 Ga. 516 (2) (49 S. E. 595); Southern Railway Co. v. Lancaster, 149 Ga. 434 (100 S. E. 380); Bowen V. Holland, 182 Ga. 430 (185 S. E. 720).

2. “Under the general, inherent powers of a court of equity, the judge of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Owenby v. StancilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Ramey v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Wynne v. FisherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. Richards v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Bond v. RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MacOn-bibb County Water & Sewerage Authority v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. FIRST NATIONAL BANK &C. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Seckinger v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  5. Rockefeller v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API