Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1935No. Civ. 9493PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

The above-entitled actions were brought to recover upon two undertakings which were furnished in an action for injunctive relief entitled London v. Robinson and Moren. One of the undertakings in the sum of $1,000 was furnished upon the granting of a restraining order and the other undertaking in the sum of $3,000 was furnished upon the granting of a preliminary injunction. In said action for injunctive relief, a permanent injunction was thereafter granted but the decision was reversed on appeal. (London v. Robinson et al., 94 Cal. App. 774 [271 Pac. 921].) Upon a second trial of that action,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Mitchell v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Curtiss v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Moore v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Bustamente v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Russell v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Renaud Sales Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
  3. City of Burbank v. NordahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Rutledge v. RutledgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Surety Savings & Loan Ass'n v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API