Legal Opinion

Bustamente v. Stewart

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,575PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, and an order denying a new trial, in the Eighteenth District Court, County of San Bernardino. McNealy, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Eoss, J.:

This is an action upon an injunction bond given in a suit brought by a certain Colony Association, as plaintiff, against these plaintiffs and others, as defendants, to recover damages for an alleged trespass upon certain lands, and praying also for the issuance of an injunction restraining the defendants from the commission of certain acts complained of. In that action the defendants were by an order of the Court enjoined from the commission of those acts. The injunction was finally dissolved, and the present plaintiffs sue to recover damages al*116leged by them to have been sustained by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McConihe v. . the New York and Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Jennings v. LoringIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Willson v. McEvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Mitchell v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Curtiss v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Olds v. CaryOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Russell v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API