Legal Opinion

In Re Gilbreath

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided October 14, 2008No. 19-80058PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEBTORS’ OBJECTION TO CLAIM NUMBER 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, AND 28 OF ECAST SETTLEMENT CORPORATION

[Docket Nos. 30-36]

JEFF BOHM, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

In its opinion in Parsley, this Court cautioned that it would continue to monitor the shoddy practices of creditors and their attorneys resulting from the corrosive “assembly line” culture fostered by flat fee engagements that have become common in the consumer bankruptcy field. In re Parsley, 384 B.R. 138, 183-85 (Bankr. S.D.Tex.2008). In In re Prevo, 394 B.R. 847 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.2008), this Court,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. In The Matter Of Fidelity Holding Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. In the Matter of Emil Stavriotis and Judith Stavriotis, Debtors. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Navarro-Miranda v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re DePughUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  2. In Re DePughUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  3. In Re O'BrienUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. In re RaygozaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
  5. Casamatta v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. (In re Freeman-Clay)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API