Legal Opinion
In re Raygoza
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 1, 2016No. CASE NO: 15-10377PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION SUSTAINING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO NOTICE OF POSTPETITION MORTGAGE FEES, EXPENSES, AND CHARGES OF PLAINS CAPITAL BANK
[Resolving ECF No. 81]
Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge
I. Introduction
Who would have imagined that reasonable minds could differ about the interpretation of a single word, to wit: “incurred”. Yet, that interpretation is largely the turning point in this case. PlainsCapital Bank (“PCB”), a secured creditor, brought its Notice of Post-Petition Mortgage Fees, Expenses, and Charges seeking, in part, $505.80 in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. SharifSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re SierraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
- In re GarzaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
- In re OkaforUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018
- In re MandevilleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- In re McPhilamyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.