Legal Opinion
Anthony v. Schuppel
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 20, 2000No. CIV.AMD 99-2346PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
Petitioner Kami Lee Anthony, a Maryland inmate, instituted this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging her conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine. 1 The state has answered the petition, inter alia, through the timely invocation of the procedural default doctrine. As the court is persuaded that the procedural default doctrine bars consideration of petitioner’s claims, the petition shall be dismissed with prejudice.
I
The facts underlying Ms. Anthony’s case were set forth as follows in the reported opinion of the Maryland Court of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Malcum v. BurtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Holloway v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Adkins v. BohrerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Joppy v. DoveyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Schisler v. D.P.S.C.S.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.