Legal Opinion

Eckenroad v. Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1942No. Appeal, 280PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

After an award by a referee of compensation for disability, total at first and subsequently partial, had been reversed by the board, and its order of disallowance affirmed by the court below, Clarence Eckenroad, the claimant, appealed to this court from the judgment entered in favor of his employer. The board having found as a fact “that the claimant has failed to show that he suffered a compensable accident,” (within the meaning of Sec. 301 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, 77 PS §§411, 431, as last amended by the Act of June 21, 1939, P.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Harring v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Paydo v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Corrento v. VentrescaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kasman v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Mancuso v. MancusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Demuzzio v. Lattimer Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Evancik v. Coal Mining Co. of Graceton, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Martz v. Butler County Mushroom Farm, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API