Kasman v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
This is another of those utterly futile appeals in a workmen’s compensation case by which we are asked to invade the exclusive province of the compensation authorities and reverse a finding made against the claimant by a referee, and adopted by the board, upon the controlling medical issue of fact, although it is fully supported by the testimony of the attending physician and another medical expert. We have repeatedly held that where there is competent and substantial evidence on the record sufficient to sustain the findings of the board, as the ultimate fact-finding…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ford v. A. E. Dick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Hunter v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Lupfer v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Corrento v. VentrescaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Gasperin v. Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Harris v. Meyers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Rozauski v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Globe Security Systems Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Witters v. Harrisburg Steel CorporationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.