Corrento v. Ventresca
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadtfeld, J.,
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas No. 1 of Philadelphia County, affirming an award of compensation to the widow of Gerardo Corrento, made by the referee and affirmed by the board.
The decedent, Gerardo Corrento, was employed by the defendant, Pacifico Ventresca, on a sewer construction project in the city of Philadelphia on August 11, 1939. In the course of the excavation wtork being performed that morning, four dynamite charges were set off. Between eight and fifteen minutes following the last blast, a sewer wall, which had previously…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dickey v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Franks v. Point Marion Bridge Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Ferrante v. FerranteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Pelosi v. Overbrook Tile Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Frederick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kennedy v. Holmes Const. Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Kasman v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Mancuso v. MancusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Osterritter v. Moore-Flesher Hauling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Bogavich v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.