Legal Opinion

White v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 15, 2003No. 17PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

We granted certiorari in this case to decide two questions: whether the Court of Special Appeals should have applied Dingle v. State, 361 Md. 1, 759 A.2d 819 (2000), in deciding whether the trial court erred in the voir dire examination of the jury venire, and whether petitioner’s statement was inadmissible in evidence because the police officers interrogated him in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).1 The Court of Special Appeals, in an unreported opinion, resolved both issues in favor of the State, thus, affirming the petitioner’s conviction.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Connors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Rush v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. State v. LuckettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. State v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API