Legal Opinion
State v. Tolbert
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 8, 2004No. 83, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal by the State, 1 the issue presented is whether the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County erred in granting the defendant’s motion to suppress his statements on the grounds that the statements were in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) and that the statements were involuntary. This Court issued its Per Curiam Order on February 11, 2004, reversing the Order of the Circuit Court and remanding the matter for trial. 2 State v. Tolbert, 379 Md. 424, 842 A.2d 63 (2004). We now give the reasons for that Order.
I
T…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Rush v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Prioleau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.