Legal Opinion
Casey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1927No. 5104PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
Defendant (plaintiff in error) was adjudged guilty upon both counts of an indictment charging him (1) with the purchase of 3.4 grains morphine not in the original stamped package; and (2) with having dispensed morphine without having registered or paid the special tax as re*753quired by law, venue of both charges, Seattle, Wash., and time of both, December 31, 1925. The sentences were the same on both counts, the terms of imprisonment to run concurrently-
The sufficiency of the first count is not seriously challenged. One of the clauses is grammatically misplaced, but the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Braden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Ng Sing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Stubbs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Nathan Shurman and Louis Chebatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. RutkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Andrew Pitts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Mario Balestreri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Mullaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.