Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 21, 1924No. 4077PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.RUDKIN, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The objections to the indictment and the objections to the charge of the court present the same questions in some of their aspects, but we will first take up the objections to the charge. We may say at the outstart that the prosecution is not aided in any way by the reference in the indictment to the amendment of 1919 (40 Stat. 1057), because the indictment itself does riot charge a single fact necessary tp bring the case within the purview of that amendment. Pendleton v. U. S(C. C. A.) 290 Fed. 388. The rulings of the court below must…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Quinn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Bartlett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  4. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
  5. Bacigalupi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Butzman v. United States. Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. Casey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. Lamento v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Rossi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  5. Franklin v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API