Legal Opinion
Ng Sing v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 30, 1925No. 4577PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). [1,2] When the government rested its ease, counsel for the plaintiffs in error asked leave to present a motion for a directed verdict of not guilty as to the first count of the indictment, in the absence of the jury, and the denial of this request is assigned as error. Such requests are always addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and no abuse of discretion is here shown or claimed, inasmuch as the court denied the motion for a directed verdict without comment of any kind. One of the plaintiffs in error testified in his own' behalf that he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. Wong SingSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Rossi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. IngCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Cochran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- United States v. GlasserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Mullaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Casey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.