Legal Opinion
Elbert, Ltd. v. Clare
California Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1953No. L. A. 22250PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff brought this action for partition pursuant to section 752 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It claimed title to the property by treasurer’s deed issued after foreclosure of a street improvement bond authorized under the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730; 3 Deering's Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 8199.) Defendant claimed title through a tax deed issued after conveyance to the state for the nonpayment of taxes. (Rev. & Tax. Code, div. 1, pt. 6, ch. 7.) Judgment for partition was entered and the rights of the parties were decreed thereunder. Our review of the record convinces us that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Peterson v. GibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Burns v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Thomas Tabor and Agnes F. Tabor v. Teresa C. UlloaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Everet L. Hagan v. George L. Gardner, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Flintridge Heights, Inc., a Bankrupt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Kwang Hoon Kim v. Song YiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Montgomery v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.