Legal Opinion
Avenente v. Smouse
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 11, 1965No. 1 CA-IC 6PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Judge.
Respondent, Addie Pat Smouse, filed a claim which was received by the Industrial 'Commission on 28 February, 1963. Mrs. Smouse claimed an injury to her back while working for petitioner in his bar in Flor•ence, Arizona.
The Industrial Commission on 18 March, 1963, entered its findings and award for Non-Compensable Claim. The Commission found that the petitioner did not sustain an injury as claimed. “Notice of Protest of Award and Petition, for Application for Rehearing” were duly filed by the respondent, Smouse, and a second hearing was held in Florence on 29 April, 1963. On 19…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Schnatzmeyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Simpkins v. State Banking DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Kelsey v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Thiel v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Commercial Union Companies v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Edwards v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Wieseler v. PrinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- A.J. Bayless Markets, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.