Legal Opinion

A.J. Bayless Markets, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 30, 1982No. 1 CA-IC 2498PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

In this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission, the petitioners contend (1) that they were denied the right to cross-examine the authors of a medical report submitted pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-901.03 1 and (2) that there is no foundation for the medical opinion that claimant’s condition is causally related to her employment. We hold that petitioners waived their right to cross-examine the authors of the medical report and that there is sufficient foundation for the medical opinion. The award is therefore affirmed.

Claimant filed a claim for workmen’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Hunter v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. Avenente v. SmouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Cash v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Manuel M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Webb v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Bd. of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Earl v. Cryovac, a Division of W.R. Grace Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Goglia v. BodnarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. Simkus v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API