Simpkins v. State Banking Department
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
This is an appeal from an award of the Industrial Commission denying E. L. Simpkins, hereinafter called petitioner, compensation for a certain injury received by him in Yuma county on December 27, 1933.
There are three assignments of error, but there is only one real question for our consideration, and that is whether the Industrial Commission was justified in finding there was not sufficient evidence to establish that petitioner’s injuries were caused by an accident arising out of and occurring within the course of his employment.
It is necessary, therefore, for us to examine the evidence, as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Doby v. Miami Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Crozier v. NoriegaArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Edens v. L. E. Dixon Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ratley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Phelps v. Positive Action Tool Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Schnatzmeyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Ortega v. Ed Horrell & SonArizona Supreme Court · 1961
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.