Legal Opinion
Commercial Union Companies v. Smallwood
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1976No. 2443PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
In October of 1973, appellee William S. Smallwood filed an application for adjustment of claim with the Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Board, alleging that as a result of his employment with appellant Burgess Construction Company he suffered renal failure which necessitated the removal of his kidneys. 1
The evidence presented at the Board hearing consisted of the testimony of Smallwood and of Phil Tannehill, another truck driver. In addition, Smallwood’s attorney introduced, over objection, medical reports furnished by Doctors Tenck-hoff and Wood, two treating…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Beauchamp v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Employers Commercial Union Insurance Group v. SchoenAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Avenente v. SmouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
3Cited by20 opinions
- Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- DeNuptiis v. Unocal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- At & T ALASCOM v. OrchittAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Providence Washington Insurance Co. v. BonnerAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.