Reiner v. Schroeder
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. C. H. Lindley, H. R. Raynes, and John H. Magoffey, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
There are two appeals in this case, taken by defendant at different times on separate transcripts,— Sac. No. 1105, an appeal from the judgment on the judgment-roll, and Sac. No. 1204, an appeal from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Both appeals will be disposed of in this opinion.
Appeal from the judgment. Plaintiff alleges in his complaint : 1. “ That he is now and ever since July 1st, 1899, has been the owner and entitled to the possession of certain real estate, described as ‘ Schroeder Consolidated Quartz Mining Claim,’ consisting of the ‘Mountain Boy,’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Donahue v. MeisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hughes v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Landregan v. PeppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Newman v. DuaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Hayden v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Hyatt v. ColkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Norback v. Board of Directors of Church Extension Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
- Stern v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.