Legal Opinion

State v. Watson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 8, 1973No. 7321SC540PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

On this appeal defendants object primarily to the methods by which the officers have obtained the evidence which resulted in their convictions. They assert that the prosecution should be required to disclose the name of the confidential informant who gave the information upon which a search warrant was based and make him available to testify in their defense. They challenge the manner in which the search warrant was served as constituting an illegal entry thereby tainting the fruits of the search. These questions are serious and concern the delicate balance which must be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PrevetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API