State v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
In her brief, defendant has failed to state the questions and pertinent assignments of error and exceptions at the beginning of each argument as required by Appellate Rule 28(b)(3) which provides: “Immediately following each question [presented in the brief] shall be a reference to the assignments of error and exceptions pertinent to the question . . Appeals are subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. We will, however, consider the appeal on its merits despite the difficulties presented by the appellant’s brief.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. John Manuel SolisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. BagnardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. John Christopher BealeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Horton ex rel. Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Robert Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- State v. CuthrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.