Legal Opinion

People v. Columbus

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1920No. Crim. No. 735PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for new trial. The evidence tending to establish his guilt consists of the direct testimony of a little girl, five years of age, and his own written, signed confession, made by him at the police station on the evening of the alleged crime, in the presence of a number of police officers. The prosecution’s preliminary evidence upon the admissibility of the confession, as the free and voluntary act of the accused, consists of the testimony of two police officers who testified that defendant made his confession freely…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  2. State v. Andrew.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
  3. People v. MacPheeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. State v. ShermanMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People v. CahillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. SalazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. People v. CrowlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API