Legal Opinion

People v. Salaz

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1924No. Crim. No. 1046PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Upon an information charging him with the murder of Ignacio Gonzales, defendant was convicted of manslaughter, and now appeals from the judgment and from an order denying him a new trial.

Defendant, who in the trial court admitted the killing hut claimed that it was done in necessary self-defense, claims here that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict. The salient facts in the ease are these: Decedent lived with his wife and family in a house located about a block and a half from the scene of the tragedy, which occurred near the intersection of Gabriel and Effie Streets, in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. StaplesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People v. WestlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. LevittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. People v. AcostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. FreudenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API