Legal Opinion
Alaska Pulp Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 14, 2001No. 95-153CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Alaska Pulp Corporation (“APC”), alleges that the United States Forest Service in various ways breached its timber contract. Among other things, APC claims that the government’s implementation of the Tongass Timber Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 101-626, 104 Stat. 4426 (1990) (“TTRA”), repudiated and materially breached the contract with APC. The matter before us is APC’s motion for partial summary judgment regarding the government’s liability on the TTRA claim.
While admitting that the TTRA breached the contract, defendant contends that APC has failed to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Imperial Tobacco Limited, Assignee of Imperial Group Plc v. Philip Morris, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Cities Service Helex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Westfed Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Kimberly Associates, an Idaho Limited Partnership v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Alaska Pulp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Industrial Door Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.