Legal Opinion

Schiltz v. Meyer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1972No. 71-207PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteen, J.

We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

The issue is whether the substantive law of Ohio or Kentucky should be applied in an Ohio law suit between two residents of Kentucky, arising from an automobile accident which occurred in Ohio, wherein the plaintiff was a passenger-guest in an automobile driven by the defendant.

We have considered the rule of lex loci delicti in many previous cases. Freas v. Sullivan (1936), 130 Ohio St 486; Collins v. McClure (1944), 143 Ohio St. 569; Ellis v. Gar-*171wood (1958), 168 Ohio St. 241; Lyons v. Lyons (1965), 2 Ohio St. 2d 243; Fox v. Morrison Motor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seeley v. Expert, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Fox v. Morrison Motor Freight, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lyons v. LyonsOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Collins v. McClureOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Angela M. Phelps v. John D. McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Morgan v. Biro Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Barker v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Moats v. Metropolitan Bank of LimaOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Jones v. Wittenberg UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API