Legal Opinion
Omni USA, Inc. v. Parker-Hannifin Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 8, 2013No. Civil Action No. H-10-4728PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.
The above referenced action alleges that Defendant Parker-Hannifin Corporation (“Parker”) improperly designed, manufactured, marketed, and serviced defective industrial oil seals sold to Plaintiff Omni USA, Inc. (“Omni”) specifically for use in its gearboxes,, sold as part of agricultural irrigation systems to a third party. The Court’s Opinion and Order of March 27, 2012, 2012 WL 1038642 (instrument # 26) dismissed with prejudice claims brought by Omni against Parker for fraud, fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation, and violations…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Baker Hughes Proc & Pipel Svc v. UE Compression, LCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Walsh v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Andrews v. Dial Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.