Legal Opinion
In re Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 2, 2014No. Nos. 13-MD-2434 (CS), 13-MC-2434 (CS), 13-CV-7811 (CS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SEIBEL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (13-CV-7811 Doc. 33; 13-MD-2434 Doc. 881.) For the following *348reasons, - Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I. BACKGROUND
For purposes of this Motion to Dismiss, I accept as true the facts, but not the conclusions, as set forth in the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). (13-CV-7811 Doc. 29.) I recite only those facts relevant to this decision.
Plaintiff is a resident and citizen of Indiana. (SAC ¶ 1.) Defendants are three related companies that manufacture, design, formulate and package…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Kailash C. Pani, M.D., and Kailash C. Pani, M.D., P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Krakowski v. American Airlines, Inc. (In re AMR Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Lopez-Serrano v. RockmoreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Beverly Quentin v. Grannell E. Knox, Sr.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Bob Davis Paint & Drywall Inc. v. The Valspar CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
- Brown Media Corp. v. K & L Gates, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.