Legal Opinion

Marriage of Bredeson v. Bredeson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1986No. C9-85-890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Lynn Bredeson appeals from an amended judgment increasing his child support obligation for Amanda Bredeson. Appellant claims the trial court erred (1) in failing to deviate downward from the guidelines since he has three children; (2) in failing to deduct or make some allowance for his job relocation and visitation expenses; and (3) in failing to make findings regarding the child’s needs, appellant’s needs and the incomes of respondent and her husband. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Respondent has been receiving $115 per month as support for Amanda (born 1/30/76), since the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Marriage of Derence v. DerenceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Giencke v. HaglundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Weinand v. WeinandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Marriage of Black v. BitkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bruning v. JeffriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pitkin v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Wollschlager v. WollschlagerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Bruning v. JeffriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Pitkin v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API