Legal Opinion

Rubenstein v. Rubenstein

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1972No. 43410PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harold W. Schultz, Justice. *

Appeal by defendant husband from an order of the Hennepin County District Court modifying an amended judgment and decree of divorce. Plaintiff wife also seeks review of the order and the decree itself.

The questions for determination are (1) whether or not the trial court erred in refusing to reduce or terminate alimony and child-support payments where the assets of the defendant have diminished in value or are encumbered, and (2) whether the court erred in refusing to consider other factors apart from defendant’s finances.

The parties were divorced pursuant to a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Mark v. MarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Haskell v. HaskellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Botkin v. BotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. McKey v. McKeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wiese v. WieseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Sieber v. SieberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Giencke v. HaglundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Calvert v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API