Legal Opinion

Krog v. Krog

California Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1948No. L. A. 20320, 20402PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff-respondent to stay proceedings on two consolidated appeals. The motion is made upon the ground that defendant-appellant has not complied with orders of the superior court that he pay to plaintiff certain sums of money as child support, medical expenses, attorneys’ fees and costs in the trial court, plus further sums as attorneys’ fees and costs on appeal, and that defendant deposit with the court trustee $7,500 as security for sums “now due and to become due.”

On January 24, 1945, plaintiff filed her complaint for divorce against defendant. She alleged, among…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Rosher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Carbone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Klemm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Sharove v. MiddlemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API