Legal Opinion
Klemm v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1977No. Civ. 3453PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), P. J .
The ultimate issue herein is to what extent one attorney may represent both husband and wife in a noncontested dissolution proceeding where the written consent of each to such representation has been filed with the court.
Dale Klemm (hereinafter husband) and Gail Klemm (hereinafter wife) were married and are the parents of two minor children. They separated after six years of marriage, and the wife filed a petition for dissolution of the marriage in propria persona. There was no community property, and neither party owned any substantial personal property. Both…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. Superior Court (Greer)California Supreme Court · 1977
- Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- William H. Raley Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Betts v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Acheson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- River West, Inc. v. NickelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- In Re Wilde Horse Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.