Legal Opinion

Rosher v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1937No. L. A. 16212PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This ease was transferred to this court after hearing and decision by the district court of appeal, second district, division two, in order that we might give further consideration to the question of the effect of the amendment of section 25 of the Civil Code (Stats. 1927, p. 1119) raising the age of majority for females from eighteen to twenty-one years, upon a support order in a divorce action made prior to its effective date.

The case is here on proceedings to review an order adjudging petitioner to be in contempt of court for failure to pay the amount specified in the order.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Dixon v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Springstun v. SpringstunWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Southern California Edison Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Sillman v. SillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Monticello v. MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API