Legal Opinion
Walker v. Lakewood Condominium Owners Ass'n
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 26, 1999No. CV 93-4531 DT (ANX)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NAKAZATO, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is a motion to compel answers to special interrogatories (“Motion”) that raises what appear to be the following novel questions:(1) Whether interrogatories that were served, but objected to and not answered, count against the 25 interrogatory limit imposed by Rule1 33(a) and Local Rule 8.2.1?(2) Whether a propounding party can circumvent the numerical limit by unilaterally “withdrawing” interrogatories after the responding party has prepared and served a written response?
For the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Richard Davis v. Robert H. FendlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Howard Jay Josephs v. Harris Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Bobby Rydell MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daryl F. GATES, Etc., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Safeco v. RawstronDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Chavez v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2002
- Associated Mgmt. Servs., Inc. v. RuffMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- Liguria Foods, Inc. v. Griffith Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2017
- Autoridad de Carreteras y Transportacion v. TransCore Atlantic, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
- Jane Doe 130 v. Archdiocese of Portland in OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.