Legal Opinion
United States v. Renault, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 28, 1960PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
In this civil antitrust action, plaintiff has moved for orders sustaining its objections to defendants’ interrogatories to the extent that they have not been answered, and defendants have moved for orders requiring responsive answers to most of those interrogatories that have been answered.
Plaintiff’s complaint charges defendants with unreasonably restraining trade and commerce in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C. *26§ 1, and section 3 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731,15 U.S.C. § 14.
Defendants Renault, Inc. and Peugeot, Inc. import…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- General Motors Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Martínez Rivera v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- Meese v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Anderson v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Luey v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965
- Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.