Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wright

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 23, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by defendants Eric Wright (‘Wright”) and Komeeka Farm & Equestrian Center (“Komeeka”)2 of the trial court’s allowance of the plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss their appeal for procedural noncompliance.

Kimberly Smith (“Smith”) commenced this action against Wright and Komeeka (“defendants”), her neighbors, claiming trespass and intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from the defendants’ alleged illegal entry onto Smith’s Tyngsborough property, destruction of a greenhouse, and noisy use of farm equipment on the defendants’ own property. The defendants filed an answer…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Vyskocil v. VyskocilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Sonogram of New England, Inc. v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
  4. Arequipeno v. HallMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  5. New England Technical Sales Corp. v. SEEQ Technology, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HRI Services, Inc. v. LSZ, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014
  2. Bianco v. GrahamMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015
  3. Ciriello v. FortinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API